Jason Holder is the number one all-rounder in Tests, Ben Stokes is number two. Yet why is he lagging behind Stokes in stardom to find the answer to the question of
who is Holder , Jason Holder or Ben Stokes? There is no doubt that most people will write the name of England's World Cup winning star Stokes in the answer box. West Indies captain Holder also knows it well. But Holder doesn't understand why everyone is talking more about Stokes than him. He is the world number one all-rounder in the Test rankings, Stokes number two; Informing this information, Kal said that he wants to respond to this neglect in the field.
International cricket will return to the field today after 116 days. Holder's West Indies will face Stokes' England in the first Test at Southampton. Many see the match as a battle for the supremacy of the two best all-rounders in the world. "I don't like to talk about these personal achievements or the ICC rankings," Holder told a news conference yesterday. Ben (Stokes) is talked about all the time, because he deserves it. He is a really good cricketer. However, the ICC rankings say I am the number one all-rounder in the world. I probably don't get as much credit as I should. Who knows why I don't get it? '
Although he was sad, he said that having someone like Stokes in the opposing team inspired him to play well, 'Honestly, I don't think about it. There are journalists, you write. I came here just to play cricket. When you play against an opponent like Stokesy, there will always be a fierce battle on the field. '
Former England captain Mike Atherton says he is the best Caribbean captain holder he has seen since Viv Richards. The last time the West Indies won a Test series on English soil was in 1989, when Viv. Will the holder be able to bring back those old memories after 32 years?
Holder's side won the series last year, beating England 2-1 on home soil. Holder scored the first double century of his Test career in the first match of the series. The Caribbean captain can only dream of conquering England.
0 Comments